Web1 mrt. 1992 · Then he included all the animals—fish, whales, clams, etc.—along with the land animals. I explained that the Bible clearly teaches that it was only those "in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land" ( Genesis 7:22) that were present on the Ark, and that, although marine animals died by the trillions in the ... WebIn their book, The Genesis Flood, Doctors Morris and Whitcomb say that only 35,000 individual animals needed to go on the ark. John Woodmorappe, the author of Noah's Ark: A Feasibility Study, believes that an even smaller number of animals would have been transported upon the ark.

The Resource for Answering the Critics of Noah

WebSo many animal species exist in the world today...how could Noah have possibly fit them all on his Ark? Does the Bible provide answers? Yes! In this lecture,... Web18 jan. 2024 · Here’s another so-called contradiction Ehrman places before us. Ehrman says that in Genesis 7:2, we read that there are “seven pairs” of clean animals; in verses 9 and 10, it says “two by two” that the animals were to go in the ark. And Ehrman believes that these two statements are contradictory — but he hasn’t read the story well ... re5 nord fahrplan

What made some animals clean and others unclean …

WebThis is a list of the animals who appeared on Noah's Ark. List. Reginald; Tutu; Elephants; Benny; Porkchop; Hamsters; Lions; Kangaroos; Geckos; Cows; Penguins; … Web26 jul. 2006 · This is one of the easiest so-called contradictions to resolve. Verses 2 and 3 give us the number of the animals which were to be taken upon the ark. Seven male and female pairs of clean animals and birds were to be taken, while one pair (a male and a female) of unclean animals were to come. Verses 8 and 9, on the ... Web8 sep. 2006 · Woodmorappe has suggested about 8,000 kinds—including extinct kinds—in his very detailed work, Noah’s Ark: A Feasibility Study. Therefore the Ark would have … re5 not launching